
Justice Gorsuch’s Legal Philosophy Has a Precedent Problem
How should a textualist deal with bad case law?

A special project on the constitutional debates in American life, in partnership with the National Constitution Center
This work was commissioned, produced, and edited by The Atlantic's editorial staff. Support for this work was provided in part by the organizations listed here.
Support for this project was provided by the Madison Initiative of the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation.

How should a textualist deal with bad case law?

The past decade has witnessed a dangerous trend: a judicial branch that expresses deep suspicion of the legislative branch’s competence and motives.

Whatever its shape, the era ahead must rekindle the aspiration of a nation molded in the ideal of perfect equality.

The Supreme Court has betrayed the promise of equal citizenship by allowing police to arrest and kill Americans at will.

Why is the Supreme Court giving more deference to a state grand jury than the Congress of the United States?

Nonmembers who flout tribal stay-at-home orders could pose an existential threat to tribal communities.

American democracy requires informed citizens. But in many places, the industry responsible is withering before our eyes.

The groundwork is now in place for major conservative wins in the years ahead.

Properly understood, the commutation of Roger Stone’s sentence is unconstitutional.

The chief justice has worked to persuade his colleagues to put institutional legitimacy above partisanship.