
Mazars Is a Victory for Rule of Law
As to Trump’s claim to what his legal team once characterized as “temporary absolute presidential immunity,” the Supreme Court’s answer was simple: No.

A special project on the constitutional debates in American life, in partnership with the National Constitution Center
This work was commissioned, produced, and edited by The Atlantic's editorial staff. Support for this work was provided in part by the organizations listed here.
Support for this project was provided by the Madison Initiative of the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation.

As to Trump’s claim to what his legal team once characterized as “temporary absolute presidential immunity,” the Supreme Court’s answer was simple: No.

The chief justice is signaling his willingness to roll back abortion rights—if only activists would listen.

Religious groups are getting special treatment from the government’s pandemic-relief efforts.

The Supreme Court has now given its approval to something LGBTQ people have long fought for: the opportunity to live and thrive in this country.

A president’s behavior need not be precedent-setting.

America’s courts have placed little value on the rights of black people.

Being a Dreamer is.

The legal reasoning may look like it turns on obscure technicalities, but the administration’s cases are falling apart because of something much more deeply wrong.