Who the next president appoints to the Supreme Court could revolutionize—or reinforce—big money’s dominance of political campaigns.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 8-1 that the state’s jury-sentencing system in capital cases violates the Sixth Amendment.
The justices consider a challenge to labor organizations without weighing the practical implications of their decision.
Justices are about to hear oral arguments for a case that could seriously impede labor's fundraising abilities.
Science is not a separate realm that sits outside culture.
The U.S. Supreme Court struggles to stretch a Constitution written for 13 coastal states to encompass non-contiguous states, dependent nations, insular areas, and a commonwealth.
The effort of some U.S. Supreme Court justices to extend the Second Amendment’s protections to all guns in common use is at odds with its history.
The debate over ‘mismatch theory’ is needlessly polarized—and further research will help students, whatever the answers it generates.
For the second time, the justices of the Supreme Court are struggling with Fisher v. University of Texas—and the divisive questions it raises.
The court was divided in a case that could dramatically reshape the rules for redistricting in the states.
The Court is considering a major change in the way legislative districts are drawn.
A case being argued before the U.S. Supreme Court would limit representation to eligible voters—favoring wealthier, whiter, and more conservative citizens.
The justices carried on old quarrels in new cases as the term came to a close.
The justices had given the EPA wide latitude to limit air pollutants before ruling against the agency on Monday.
In his latest dissent, against the pro-same-sex-marriage finding of Obergefell v. Hodges, the Supreme Court justice invoked … hippies and fortune cookies.
Disparate-impact claims survived in a 5-4 decision, but the narrow opinion suggests a tough fight ahead for civil-rights laws.
A 5-4 decision limits the use of policies that cause segregation, but not segregation itself.
The chief justice’s opinion upholding Obamacare aims to fulfill his promise to serve as an impartial umpire.
The U.S. Supreme Court upholds Obamacare in a 6-3 decision, deferring to the intent of legislators.