|
|
|
TOP
|
Post
|
Reply
|
Reply/Quote
|
Email Reply
Previous | Next | Previous Topic | Next Topic |
| Topic: | 3) The 'commercial 'a' ' (1 of 6), Read 61 times |
| Conf: | Word Fugitives, with Barbara Wallraff |
| From: |
|
| Date: | Wednesday, December 02, 1998 11:00 AM |
Joss Randall, of Paris, France, writes: "For some time I have been trying to find the word for the well-known symbol @. In the past, it was also known as the 'commercial "a,"' because it was used to indicate so many pears or whatever at such-and-such a price. In French it is an 'arobase,' but what about in English?"
I've looked into this question more than once before but never found a satisfactory answer. I think we're going to have to coin something. Help?
|
TOP
|
Post
|
Reply
|
Reply/Quote
|
Email Reply
Previous | Next | Previous Topic | Next Topic |
| Topic: | 3) The 'commercial 'a' ' (2 of 6), Read 56 times |
| Conf: | Word Fugitives, with Barbara Wallraff |
| From: |
|
| Date: | Wednesday, December 02, 1998 05:48 PM |
I've always called it an "at sign". That's
technically a phrase, not a word, but do $
and % feel slighted by their names? (and
even in the commercial context, it is read as
"at")
rachel at post dot harvard dot ed yoo
|
TOP
|
Post
|
Reply
|
Reply/Quote
|
Email Reply
Previous | Next | Previous Topic | Next Topic |
| Topic: | 3) The 'commercial 'a' ' (3 of 6), Read 53 times |
| Conf: | Word Fugitives, with Barbara Wallraff |
| From: |
|
| Date: | Wednesday, December 02, 1998 06:52 PM |
Rachel, that's an excellent point about $ and %. To someone thinking of & and *, it seems obvious that @ *ought* to have a "name." But maybe @ does belong in the other category. Of course, there's no reason we can't give it a new one-word name, if anyone can come up with a good one. People do keep wondering and asking.
|
TOP
|
Post
|
Reply
|
Reply/Quote
|
Email Reply
Previous | Next | Previous Topic | Next Topic |
| Topic: | 3) The 'commercial 'a' ' (4 of 6), Read 48 times |
| Conf: | Word Fugitives, with Barbara Wallraff |
| From: |
|
| Date: | Wednesday, December 02, 1998 08:12 PM |
How about "at-ostrophe"?
This is probably not etymologically back-uppable, but it's cute!
-Heidi
|
TOP
|
Post
|
Reply
|
Reply/Quote
|
Email Reply
Previous | Next | Previous Topic | Next Topic |
| Topic: | 3) The 'commercial 'a' ' (5 of 6), Read 36 times |
| Conf: | Word Fugitives, with Barbara Wallraff |
| From: |
|
| Date: | Thursday, December 03, 1998 10:08 PM |
I am seeing the "@" referred to in writing (at least informally) more and more as, simply, the "atsign" -- not that I approve.
|
TOP
|
Post
|
Reply
|
Reply/Quote
|
Email Reply
Previous | Next | Previous Topic | Next Topic |
| Topic: | 3) The 'commercial 'a' ' (6 of 6), Read 17 times |
| Conf: | Word Fugitives, with Barbara Wallraff |
| From: |
|
| Date: | Monday, December 07, 1998 06:00 PM |
From the Toronto Serial Diners Collective:
Yes, we all call it an "at sign": two words, not one. But we would love it if everyone would agree to call it an "atsterisk".
One Serial Diner insisted that it should be called a "flupsplat". "Why flupsplat?" I said. "Because I hate it," he replied.