
No Self-Respecting Lawyer Should Touch Trump’s Election-Fraud Claims
The president may not have to worry about keeping a job after January 20, 2021, but the attorneys doing his bidding at the moment certainly do.

A special project on the constitutional debates in American life, in partnership with the National Constitution Center
This work was commissioned, produced, and edited by The Atlantic's editorial staff. Support for this work was provided in part by the organizations listed here.
Support for this project was provided by the Madison Initiative of the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation.

The president may not have to worry about keeping a job after January 20, 2021, but the attorneys doing his bidding at the moment certainly do.

The president’s litigation strategy is unlikely to succeed, but it’s doing great harm in the meantime.

Millions of Americans could lose their insurance—and neither Joe Biden nor the states will be in a good position to do much about it.

His bald complaints are not viable legal claims—and the courts won’t save him.

Counting ballots takes time—and the process isn’t required to arbitrarily stop at the end of Election Day.

Enabling sustained minority rule at the national level is not a feature of our constitutional design, but a perversion of it.

What was once constitutionally prohibited is now constitutionally required.

The idea that people of faith must be protected from discrimination—even when that means they themselves will discriminate against others—is gaining traction in the courts.

Even if Trump were resolved to thwart a smooth transition, much of the process lies entirely outside his control.

The Constitution should be the sturdy vessel of our ideals and aspirations, not a derelict sailing ship locked in the ice of a world far from our own.