
The Great Irony of America’s Armed Anti-Lockdown Protesters
They say they are demonstrating against tyranny, but they are in fact enjoying an extreme—and dangerous—sort of liberty.

A special project on the constitutional debates in American life, in partnership with the National Constitution Center
This work was commissioned, produced, and edited by The Atlantic's editorial staff. Support for this work was provided in part by the organizations listed here.
Support for this project was provided by the Madison Initiative of the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation.

They say they are demonstrating against tyranny, but they are in fact enjoying an extreme—and dangerous—sort of liberty.

Lyle Denniston, one of the most seasoned Court watchers of all time, is unimpressed by the new format.

By accepting Trump’s argument for keeping his finances secret, the Court could strip Congress of its ability to hold this, or any, president to account.

Prosecutorial discretion is necessary for law enforcement to work. But dropping the case against Michael Flynn is an abuse of this power, one that egregiously undermines the rule of law.

In overturning the criminal convictions that resulted from the Bridgegate scandal, the Court is embracing a view of the world that is unbearably bleak.

The state claims that affirming a reservation in eastern Oklahoma could lead to thousands of state criminal convictions being thrown out. But that argument doesn’t seem to be based on facts.

The Court will soon decide whether automated calls to cellphones, however annoying they may be, are constitutionally protected.

In a crisis defined by erratic leadership in Washington, D.C., the states, as much out of desperation as by design, find themselves asserting long-dormant powers.

Members of the House simply cannot adequately respond to the needs of hundreds of thousands of people.

America’s new reality show begins Monday.