
Why There’s No National Lockdown
Enforcing a large-scale quarantine would be legally murky, even if it’s what the country needs to slow the spread of the coronavirus.

A special project on the constitutional debates in American life, in partnership with the National Constitution Center
This work was commissioned, produced, and edited by The Atlantic's editorial staff. Support for this work was provided in part by the organizations listed here.
Support for this project was provided by the Madison Initiative of the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation.

Enforcing a large-scale quarantine would be legally murky, even if it’s what the country needs to slow the spread of the coronavirus.

The dominant conservative philosophy for interpreting the Constitution has served its purpose, and scholars ought to develop a more moral framework.

The president can’t simply cancel the fall balloting, but his state-level allies could still deliver him a second term.

The Supreme Court will soon decide whether one state can constitutionally mandate “partisan balance” on its judicial benches.

It’s a time-tested and straightforward solution, and the time to plan for it is now.

The prospect, while still remote, is not purely hypothetical in the current crisis, and the risk is great.

Don’t let the coronavirus undermine America’s election.

People of both parties seem rather okay with undermining core civil liberties in order to fight the pandemic.

Poor people are more likely to see their homes and belongings seized by the state for dubious reasons.

There are three methods of mobilizing America’s citizen soldiers. Which one Trump chooses will matter a great deal.