
The Democrats Should Transmit the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate Without Delay
There are four main reasons this gambit should be abandoned.

A special project on the constitutional debates in American life, in partnership with the National Constitution Center
This work was commissioned, produced, and edited by The Atlantic's editorial staff. Support for this work was provided in part by the organizations listed here.
Support for this project was provided by the Madison Initiative of the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation.

There are four main reasons this gambit should be abandoned.

The chief justice’s role in the impeachment trial is a limited one, and he should be able to manage it easily without putting his or the Court’s legitimacy at risk.

A Fifth Circuit panel judge has changed his mind about DeRay Mckesson’s liability for violence at a Baton Rouge protest, but Americans’ right to protest is still under assault.

Closed-door proceedings may be just what the country needs.

The Constitution does not provide procedural guidelines for how an impeachment trial is to be conducted—so the senators of 1868 had to figure it out as they went.

An activist is on trial for being an activist, and the Supreme Court needs to protect anti-police protesters.

Republicans are still waiting for a convincing case that the president was acting to advance his own personal interests.

The process may be political, but it also must conform to certain legal norms.

Instead of settling on charges that relate to statutory crimes, with clear, concrete criteria, the Democrats have instead released two articles of impeachment in which the misconduct exists largely in the eye of the beholder.

Conservative activists keep asking the Court to hear cases that are already irrelevant—and, worryingly, the Court keeps saying yes.