
Bribery Is Right There in the Constitution
And “attempted” bribery, even if unsuccessful, is still bribery all the same.

A special project on the constitutional debates in American life, in partnership with the National Constitution Center
This work was commissioned, produced, and edited by The Atlantic's editorial staff. Support for this work was provided in part by the organizations listed here.
Support for this project was provided by the Madison Initiative of the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation.

And “attempted” bribery, even if unsuccessful, is still bribery all the same.

A consistent reading of the Constitution suggests that the current process of succession is constitutional—and that barring Trump from running again would not be.

Progressives used to argue that the Constitution doesn’t see race. Now conservatives have weaponized that same idea.

More than two centuries after it was designed to empower southern white voters, the system continues to do just that.

Congress should empower itself to more easily overturn Supreme Court decisions.

The same rules don’t apply now that the House has begun a formal impeachment inquiry.

And that means it’s Congress’s job to set boundaries around presidential power.

There’s no need to debate “high crimes and misdemeanors.” Bribery is enough for removal.

The American republic has lasted for more than two tumultuous centuries. But can it survive Donald Trump?

Recent cases have claimed that our founding document doesn’t defend noncitizens—even on American soil.