Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s career offers a lesson for today’s Supreme Court.
When violations of the law are hard to punish, authorities will usually give them a pass.
Constitutional scholars are already worrying about another January 6 crisis, and they warn that the next election might be harder to save.
They would have been clear-eyed about the role of the Court and the dangers of too much fidelity to their original designs.
There’s no clean end to this story.
A majority on the Supreme Court appears ready to strike down the landmark decision—but they’re not prepared for the ensuing havoc.
The conservative majority’s opinion has declared that voter fraud, not racial discrimination, is a threat to the American system of representation.
Justice Stephen Breyer hasn’t retired yet. But filling Supreme Court seats is just one battle in a war over the judiciary—one that progressives worry they’re losing.
The law’s opponents have a good chance of winning their next showdown, though it won’t threaten the law as a whole.
The longer Breyer remains, the more likely a Republican president choosing his successor becomes.
Three years after his polarizing confirmation hearings, the Supreme Court’s 114th justice remains a mystery.
What’s astonishing is that presidential criminal immunity has no grounding in actual law. It’s not in the Constitution or any federal statute, regulation, or judicial decision. It is not law at all.
We deserve nothing less than the full rights of citizenship, including the right to vote.
The vaccine rollout will create new clashes between conflicting rights.
Black civil-rights activists—and especially Black women—delivered on the promise of the Founding. Their victories are in peril.
Proposals from libertarian, conservative, and progressive scholars displayed a few striking differences—but also some profound similarities.
What the president and his lawyers have been attempting to do deserves punishment that will likely never come.
Republicans understand that Barrett’s confirmation is coming just a week before a potential electoral “bloodbath.” They don’t care.
Senators grapple with the reality that they have destroyed their own house.
Even Trump-skeptical Republicans are relishing the prospect of a 6–3 Court.