Democrats are trying to pressure the Iowa senator to confirm Obama’s choice for the U.S. Supreme Court, but that strategy shows little sign of success so far.
Despite some world-class spin from the White House, Merrick Garland’s confirmation isn’t going anywhere.
With a possible Merrick Garland confirmation and the prospect of another Democrat in the Oval Office, the left can’t help but dream about an ideal judicial docket: abortion rights, voting rights, campaign finance...
Advocates pushed for rules that would shift power toward older, white, more conservative areas—but they overreached, and the U.S. Supreme Court turned them down.
America is experiencing a revolution in religious-freedom law—transforming the rights of individual conscience into a bulwark of secular wealth and ecclesiastical power.
The constitutional maxim does not require states to use eligible voters when drawing legislative districts, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday.
A crop of court cases could change the relationship between the United States and its territories.
The justices are split—and desperate to find a solution that works for religious nonprofits and the government in a battle over birth control.
The justices pose a hypothetical in Zubik v. Burwell, one of the most-watched cases of the term.
Ignoring precedent—and forgetting the desire to appear non-partisan—set the stage for the destruction of public-sector unions.
The fight over the open seat on the U.S. Supreme Court isn’t just a partisan struggle—it revolves around the very meaning of the Constitution.
Regulatory laws based on phony health claims erode economic liberty. But some free-market conservatives have a double standard for abortion.
The U.S. Supreme Court took up the battle between birth-control coverage and religious freedom once more.
The late justice would want Merrick Garland to have a fair hearing before the Senate—because that’s the original meaning of the Constitution.
His Supreme Court case paved the way for hundreds of guns-rights lawsuits in America—but in Washington, D.C., he’s still waging war.
The appellate judge enforces rights enumerated in the Constitution while deferring to legislatures and elected officials when the Constitution doesn’t speak clearly.
He’s called the billionaire a "megalomaniac strongman" and vows not to support him—even if he's the GOP nominee.
President Obama’s new Supreme Court nominee called his work on the case “the most important thing I have ever done in my life.”
Obama’s Supreme Court nominee is the least political, most conciliatory choice. Whether that’s strategy or naïveté, confirmation is still unlikely.